Academic management through a Strategic Map: Maturity Model in the public education area

Authors

  • Geraldo Magela Jardim Barra Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7186-6344
  • Caroline Miriâ Fontes Martins Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei
  • Paula Karina Salume Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20401/rasi.12.1.1042

Keywords:

Balanced Scorecard, Strategic Map, Academic Management

Abstract

The objective was to create a maturity model for the academic management of a school system. The model was based on the CAPES assessment instrument, with indicators summarized through a strategic map. It is a comparative and prescriptive model that can be used both as a comparison tool between teaching units and to prescribe strategic actions at each point in the school system, allowing each unit to evolve from a specific stage of maturity to a more advanced one. By identifying common deviations between units, it will be possible to establish coordinated actions within the school system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Geraldo Magela Jardim Barra, Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei

Doutor em Administração pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG, Mestre em Administração pela Universidade Federal de Lavras - UFLA. Graduado em Administração pela Universidade Federal de São João Del-Rei - UFSJ, onde é Professor Adjunto no Departamento de Ciências Administrativas e Contábeis e Docente do Mestrado Profissional em Administração Pública em Rede Nacional PROFIAP.

Caroline Miriâ Fontes Martins, Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei

Professora da Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei.

Doutorado em Administração pela UFLA

Paula Karina Salume, Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei

Professora da Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei.

Doutorado em Administração pela PUC-MG

References

Antunes, L. G. R., Souza, T. A., & Castro, C. C. (2018). Redes de Empresas e Technology Roadmapping: Possibilidade de Conciliação para uma Gestão Estratégica. Revista de Administração, Sociedade e Inovação, 4(2), 127-139.

Alach, Z. (2017). Performance measurement maturity in a national set of universities. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Bingley, West Yorkshire, 66(2), 216-230.

Alboushra, M., Shahbudin, S. M. S., & Abdalla, Y. (2015). Understanding challenges of performance measurement in a public university: evidence from Sudan. Asian Social Science, Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada, 11(15), 10.

Azma, F. (2010). Qualitative Indicators for the evaluation of universities performance. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5408- 5411.

Barra, G. M. J., Silva, R. O., & Schocair, M. M. (2021). Gestão educacional com enfoque em indicadores de desempenho do balanced scorecard. Revista de Gestão e Avaliação Educacional, e63849-17.

Beard, D. (2009). Successful applications of the balanced scorecard in higher education. Journal of Education for Business, 84(5), 275-282.

Capes (2024). Ficha de Avaliação Área 27. Disponível em https://www.gov.br/capes/pt- br/centrais-de-conteudo/documentos/avaliacao/ Ficha_Administracao_P_Atualizada.pdf

Chen, S., Yang, C., & Shiau, J. (2006). The application of balanced scorecard in the performance evaluation of higher education. The TQM magazine, 18(2), 190-205.

Cullen, J., Joyce, J., Hassall, T. H., & Broadbent, M. (2003). Quality inhigher education: from monitoring to management. Quality Assurance in Education, 11(1), p. 5-14.

De Andrade, J. B. S. O., et al. (2018). A proposal of a Balanced Scorecard for an environmental education program at universities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 1674-1690.

De Biazzi, M. R., Muscat, A. R. N., & De Biazzi, J. L. (2011). Modelo de aperfeiçoamento de processos em instituições públicas de ensino superior. Gestão e Produção, 18(4), p. 869-880.

Dinçer, H., Yüksel, S., & Martínez, L. (2019). Balanced scorecard-based analysis about european energy investment policies: a hybrid hesitant fuzzy decision-making approach with quality function deployment. expert systems with applications, Expert Systems with Applications, 115, 152-171.

Fontes, D. A. (2024). Avaliação da maturidade em gestão de processos em um setor de um Instituto Federal de Educação usando o modelo PEMM.

Hammer, M. (2007). The process audit. Harvard Business Review, 111-123.

Hladchenko, M. (2015). Balanced Scorecard-a strategic management system of the higher education institution. International Journal of Educational Management, Bingley, West Yorkshire, England, 29(2), 167-176.

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. (2004). Mapas estratégicos-balanced scorecard: convertendo ativos tangíveis em resultados tangíveis. Rio de Janeiro: Campus.

Lawrence, S., & Sharma, U. (2002). Commodification of education and academic labour: using the balanced scorecard in a university setting. Critical perspectives on accounting, 13(5-6), 661-677.

Lipe, M. G., & Salterio, S. (2000). The balanced scorecard: Judgmental effects of common and unique performance measures. The Accounting Review, 75(3), 283-298.

Motta, G. S. (2017). Como Escrever um Bom Artigo Tecnológico? Journal of Contemporary Administration, 21(5), 4-8.

Nayeri, M. D., Mashhadi, M. M., & Mohajeri, K. (2008). Universities strategic evaluation using balanced scorecard. World Academy of Science, 37(1), 332-334.

Nickel, S. (2011). Strategic management in higher education institutions-approaches, processesand tools. Leadership and Governance in Higher Education, 3, 23.

Silva, V. R. D. (2023). Modelo de excelência pedagógica (MEP) para avaliação da maturidade da gestão educacional na educação profissional e tecnológica.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-02

Issue

Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): Jan./Abr., 2026

Section

Scientific papers

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Review of Administration, Society and Innovation

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

RASI, in accordance with Law No. 9,610 of February 19, 1998, which amends, updates and consolidates Brazilian copyright law and makes other provisions, adopts the following conditions of the Copyright Assignment:

1. RASI maintains, with the transfer of copyrights, the possession of rights over the content published;
2. The author retains his moral rights of the content, including the right to be identified as the author whenever the content is published;
3. Despite the attribution of copyright, the author retains the right to reuse the material in future collections of his own work without encumbrance. The acknowledgments of the previous publication in the RASI are the only requirements in such cases;
4. The author may make photocopies of the content, or distribute it by electronic mail or fax, provided that they are intended for their own classes and for the purpose of meeting research objectives, provided that: (a) such copies are not resold and (b) reference to the original source of the publication and the name of the RASI are clearly indicated on all copies made of the document.